collapse

* E85 Vehicles Sponsors


Author Topic: *****New "Link" Policy ***** Please Read  (Read 2526 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Dan M

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 5028
  • E85 Prices
    • E85 Vehicles
*****New "Link" Policy ***** Please Read
« on: March 30, 2007, 09:53:37 AM »
Ok we are getting far to many people that are simply registering ,promoting a link to their website and leaving..

Our Forum is for discussion ,not to be used as a link farm and I wont tolerate it.

As of Today new members must have 20 posts before they are allowed to add "links" out  to other sites  and promotions are allowed only in the Advertising and Promotions category

I dont mind supporting anyone ,I do and I will continue to do so but I will not allow our forum to become a spam magnet  .. ..our members will decide on whether a link/website has value and are allowed to link to E85 sites in the news or that hold value .

Members in good standing can certainly continue link out to E85 / Ethanol news .

Any questions PM me





« Last Edit: June 30, 2010, 09:19:35 AM by Dan M »

 

Offline coffeegroup

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 7
  • Support FARMERS not HARMERS.
    • E85 For Newbies
Re: *****New "Link" Policy ***** Please Read
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2007, 11:45:17 AM »
Smart policy. Difficult to enforce, but I run another forum for a community service group, and we get spammers in there from time to time. I feel your pain, bro.
John Coonen
Newbie85-er

 


* Untitled

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

* Menu


* E85 Vehicles Ads


* National E85 Prices


* Online Now


* GM Wants 10,000 E85 Pumps

"GM strongly supports their deployment" "We believe these pumps (blender pumps) will be critical "

* Calendar

July 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 [31]

No calendar events were found.

* E85 Pump Install Credits -Federal

Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Tax Credit A tax credit is available for the cost of installing alternative fueling equipment placed into service after December 31, 2005. < /br>Qualified alternative fuels are natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, hydrogen, electricity, E85, or diesel fuel blends containing a minimum of 20% biodiesel. < /br>The credit amount is up to 30% of the cost, not to exceed $30,000, for equipment placed into service before January 1, 2009. The credit amount is up to 50% not to exceed $50,000, for equipment placed into service on or after January 1, 2009.

Fueling station owners who install qualified equipment at multiple sites are allowed to use the credit towards each location. Consumers who purchase residential fueling equipment may receive a tax credit of up to $1,000, which increases to $2,000 for equipment placed into service after December 31, 2008. The maximum credit amount for hydrogen fueling equipment placed into service after December 31, 2008, and before January 1, 2015, is $200,000. The credit expires December 31, 2010, for all other eligible fuel types. Unused credits that qualify as general business tax credits, as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), may be carried backward one year and carried forward 20 years. For more information, see IRS Form 8911 and/or Form 3800, which are available via the IRS Web site. (Reference Public Law 111-5, Section 1123, and 26 U.S. Code 30C and 38B) Point of Contact U.S. Internal Revenue Service Phone: (800) 829-1040 http://www.irs.gov/


* Coskata


* Government Flex Fuel Vehicle Auctions

Government Agencies Used Flex Fuel Vehicles

Used FFVs


* Recent Posts

Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by fleebut
[Today at 01:01:38 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Today at 12:45:48 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Today at 12:21:51 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Today at 12:08:59 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Today at 11:15:57 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by SacramentoE-85
[Today at 10:42:12 AM]


Re: The Kingdom Movie by fleebut
[Today at 08:23:23 AM]


Re: No E85 at Woodman's in Rockford IL. by whowey
[Today at 07:35:57 AM]


Re: The Kingdom Movie by fleebut
[Today at 07:27:26 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Today at 07:16:06 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Today at 06:34:33 AM]


The Kingdom Movie by SacramentoE-85
[Yesterday at 11:26:30 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by SacramentoE-85
[Yesterday at 10:52:27 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 10:10:19 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[Yesterday at 07:46:07 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[Yesterday at 05:54:37 PM]


Re: Car & Driver alternate fuels article by TD
[Yesterday at 05:47:46 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:43:45 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:05:35 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by fleebut
[Yesterday at 05:05:02 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:01:48 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Yesterday at 04:36:39 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by Steve-O
[Yesterday at 04:20:35 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[Yesterday at 04:16:34 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 04:14:32 PM]


Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Yesterday at 04:00:42 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 03:55:27 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Yesterday at 03:55:11 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 03:50:11 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 03:50:10 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[Yesterday at 03:43:02 PM]


Re: Hey TD..Holiday Station Burnsville now has E85 by TD
[Yesterday at 03:39:22 PM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by mus302
[Yesterday at 03:35:47 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by rufus
[Yesterday at 03:35:32 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by fleebut
[Yesterday at 03:25:39 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 02:56:48 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 02:47:12 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 12:48:14 PM]


Re: Car & Driver alternate fuels article by Corey872
[Yesterday at 12:44:41 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Yesterday at 11:56:23 AM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 11:45:40 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 11:37:24 AM]


Re: US ethanol group proposes swapping subsidy for infrastructure by Dan M
[Yesterday at 10:17:08 AM]


Hey TD..Holiday Station Burnsville now has E85 by Dan M
[Yesterday at 09:18:07 AM]


Kansas E85 Pump Install Credits by Dan M
[Yesterday at 08:55:05 AM]


Re: New Vegas Station? by mpall85
[Yesterday at 08:50:54 AM]


Car & Driver alternate fuels article by beechcraftted
[Yesterday at 08:25:03 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Dan M
[Yesterday at 07:47:50 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by fleebut
[Yesterday at 07:31:20 AM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by Corey872
[Yesterday at 06:57:52 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Obormot
[Yesterday at 03:14:33 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by 1outlaw
[July 29, 2010, 11:05:39 PM]


Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:40:08 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[July 29, 2010, 07:40:12 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[July 29, 2010, 07:29:36 PM]


Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[July 29, 2010, 07:06:31 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[July 29, 2010, 06:04:00 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[July 29, 2010, 05:24:54 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by rufus
[July 29, 2010, 04:38:34 PM]


Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 04:27:07 PM]


Re: Station CLOSED in Tucson, AZ by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 01:27:26 PM]


Station CLOSED in Tucson, AZ by xstn0210
[July 29, 2010, 01:11:53 PM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by rufus
[July 29, 2010, 11:30:06 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by fleebut
[July 29, 2010, 11:12:50 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:51:01 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:48:40 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by BURNALCOHOL
[July 29, 2010, 10:22:42 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by BURNALCOHOL
[July 29, 2010, 10:09:39 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 09:51:23 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by SacramentoE-85
[July 29, 2010, 08:56:47 AM]


* Latest Images

No attachments were found.