collapse

* E85 Vehicles Sponsors


Author Topic: Why not more ethanol in Hawaii?  (Read 674 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HuskerFlex

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 385
Why not more ethanol in Hawaii?
« on: March 12, 2010, 10:14:00 AM »
I was thinking the other day, and was wondering why there is not a large scale sugar-ethanol style system in place in the 50th state, with a well established, and nearly universal e85 network of stations?

they have the soil, the climate, and due to their isolation in the middle of the ocean, they have VERY high fuel costs.  Producing local fuel would help spur the local economy, keeping more $ on the island and send less to the mainland, not to mention the middle east...

Why has this not taken root there? :-\
2008 Chrysler Town&Country 3.3 liter FFV e85 only
1999 Chevy Lumina 3.1 liter with WhiteLightning converter kit.  Now using e85 only!

 

Online fleebut

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 509
Re: Why not more ethanol in Hawaii?
« Reply #9 on: March 15, 2010, 09:17:36 AM »
There is a conundrum afoot with cellulosic ethanol of biomass. Correct me if wrong, but to the best of my knowledge, this fuel is more expensive than corn per gallon. Most  projections of 2rd and 3rd generation fuel produced at $2/gallon and another $2/gallon added by the time its sold at the pump.

You see making fuel for automotive use is less efficient process than burning fuel stock for heat. However, producing quality fuel for auto engines, that is non-polluting, is a valuable complex job. Think of ethanol as a bio green solar liquid battery. It’s an attractive comparatively low cost transportation fuel concentrating much power for the weight. It does take a complex engine to process the power.

So, what am I getting at? The Brazilians might have the better idea? Burn cellulose energy for making the ethanol processing plant the most efficient operation overall. Burning cellulose upon gasification process for plant heat and electric needs. Utilize the cogeneration of the simple gas turbine for power and heat. This is an industrial common practice nowadays. Utilize the thin stillage and bottoms for food or feed as before, but become energy independent with those corn cobs by gasification, hot air turbine generator, and steam boiler cogen. Utilize biomass first upon the most efficient use and corn for its most efficient use. Corn ethanol with it multi product stream more efficient than sugar cane. Bio-digestors, scrubbers and ability to produce pipe line quality natural gas another opportunity for corn ethanol as well as WDG feed lots.   

Offline HuskerFlex

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 385
Re: Why not more ethanol in Hawaii?
« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2010, 08:13:45 AM »
exactly... on an island with no local coal or natural gas reserves to power a traditional ethanol plant... a sugar-ethanol plant uses the waste from the sugar pressing...  usually they actually produce surplus electristy, which is sold into the local power grid as well.
2008 Chrysler Town&Country 3.3 liter FFV e85 only
1999 Chevy Lumina 3.1 liter with WhiteLightning converter kit.  Now using e85 only!

Online cessna

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2006
  • Posts: 741
Re: Why not more ethanol in Hawaii?
« Reply #7 on: March 14, 2010, 09:20:19 PM »
When I toured that plant in Brazil, I was amazed at how self contained it was. It was out in the middle of nowhere and the electric lines to the place were about like a small farm place around here. Burning the bagasse to make steam and generate electricity did the trick.

Offline HuskerFlex

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 385
Re: Why not more ethanol in Hawaii?
« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2010, 01:02:39 PM »
I had read that the sugar industry there is dying, and that the last sugar mill is about to close shop.  Producing crops for multimillion dollar losses several years in a row (drought and increased foreign competition in the US...) tends to cause any industry to die.

I was just wondering why one of these idled/abandoned sugar mills could not be purchased up for a song, and converted into a Brazilian styled bagasse (pulp left after pressing) powered ethanol distillery!  Seems like an excellent deal.  You would think that the state of Hawaii would be all over this with incentives and guarantees.  Sometimes (more often then not) logic and government policy don't seem to match up. :'(
2008 Chrysler Town&Country 3.3 liter FFV e85 only
1999 Chevy Lumina 3.1 liter with WhiteLightning converter kit.  Now using e85 only!

Offline SacramentoE-85

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1141
    • SacramentoE85
Re: Why not more ethanol in Hawaii?
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2010, 10:29:45 AM »
I noticed that also, and rented an FFV Sebring (convertible of course--Maui in August).  Drove by many sugar cane fields, burning gasoline on my way.   :(

It may be that the car rental company does have their own supply of E85 somehow, and charges $5.00 per gallon to fill up on cheap E85, for those who don't refill before returning.  I wouldn't blink an eye at the likelihood.
Sacramento E85 Website Locations of E85 stations, News, Guides, CA E85 Regulations, other CA related ethanol information.

Offline mpall85

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 93
Re: Why not more ethanol in Hawaii?
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2010, 06:22:22 AM »
I was on vacation in Hawaii two years ago and noticed that more than half of the cars on the car rental lot were flex fuel.  I asked the attendant if there was and E85 pumps available for these cars and, of course, he said there were none on the island (Hawaii).  It's got to be a scam for the car rental company to claim a certain percentage of their fleet was E85 compatible.

Offline SacramentoE-85

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1141
    • SacramentoE85
Re: Why not more ethanol in Hawaii?
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2010, 10:47:31 AM »
Sacramento E85 Website Locations of E85 stations, News, Guides, CA E85 Regulations, other CA related ethanol information.

Online cessna

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2006
  • Posts: 741
Re: Why not more ethanol in Hawaii?
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2010, 11:10:27 AM »
I posted this back in Feb. in another thread. Evidently the people of Hawaii don't think green.

Quote
Thread drift but my cousin just got back from Hawaii. He said gas was $3.77 a gal and big signs saying no ethanol. Sugarcane is just about gone over there and when the subsidy goes it's over. Looks like we have some very ignorant people in Hawaii when they could be making their own fuel and don't.

Quote
My cousin talked to a guy from Minnesota that spends the winter in Hawaii pumping gas and found this out also. They have three very old monster diesel powered electric generators that are belching black smoke. They're happy with that but wave action and wind turbine electricity is a big no-no. I think this was on Maui.

Offline Corey872

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 840
Re: Why not more ethanol in Hawaii?
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2010, 10:26:40 AM »
That is a good point.  I don't know how the economics work out, though it would seem they would have an abundance of sugar cane. Surprisingly, there is a wiki entry on it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol_fuel_in_Hawaii

∙ E85 Acura RSX-S Turbo ∙ 2.0L ∙ 12.5:1 CR ∙ Precision 5857 Turbo @ 15psi ∙
 The E85-only build begins

E85 "The biggest performance fuel bargain on the planet" - Gale Banks

 


* Untitled

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

* Menu


* E85 Vehicles Ads


* National E85 Prices


* Online Now


* GM Wants 10,000 E85 Pumps

"GM strongly supports their deployment" "We believe these pumps (blender pumps) will be critical "

* Calendar

July 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 [31]

No calendar events were found.

* E85 Pump Install Credits -Federal

Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Tax Credit A tax credit is available for the cost of installing alternative fueling equipment placed into service after December 31, 2005. < /br>Qualified alternative fuels are natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, hydrogen, electricity, E85, or diesel fuel blends containing a minimum of 20% biodiesel. < /br>The credit amount is up to 30% of the cost, not to exceed $30,000, for equipment placed into service before January 1, 2009. The credit amount is up to 50% not to exceed $50,000, for equipment placed into service on or after January 1, 2009.

Fueling station owners who install qualified equipment at multiple sites are allowed to use the credit towards each location. Consumers who purchase residential fueling equipment may receive a tax credit of up to $1,000, which increases to $2,000 for equipment placed into service after December 31, 2008. The maximum credit amount for hydrogen fueling equipment placed into service after December 31, 2008, and before January 1, 2015, is $200,000. The credit expires December 31, 2010, for all other eligible fuel types. Unused credits that qualify as general business tax credits, as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), may be carried backward one year and carried forward 20 years. For more information, see IRS Form 8911 and/or Form 3800, which are available via the IRS Web site. (Reference Public Law 111-5, Section 1123, and 26 U.S. Code 30C and 38B) Point of Contact U.S. Internal Revenue Service Phone: (800) 829-1040 http://www.irs.gov/


* Coskata


* Government Flex Fuel Vehicle Auctions

Government Agencies Used Flex Fuel Vehicles

Used FFVs


* Recent Posts

Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by fleebut
[Today at 01:01:38 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Today at 12:45:48 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Today at 12:21:51 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Today at 12:08:59 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Today at 11:15:57 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by SacramentoE-85
[Today at 10:42:12 AM]


Re: The Kingdom Movie by fleebut
[Today at 08:23:23 AM]


Re: No E85 at Woodman's in Rockford IL. by whowey
[Today at 07:35:57 AM]


Re: The Kingdom Movie by fleebut
[Today at 07:27:26 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Today at 07:16:06 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Today at 06:34:33 AM]


The Kingdom Movie by SacramentoE-85
[Yesterday at 11:26:30 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by SacramentoE-85
[Yesterday at 10:52:27 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 10:10:19 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[Yesterday at 07:46:07 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[Yesterday at 05:54:37 PM]


Re: Car & Driver alternate fuels article by TD
[Yesterday at 05:47:46 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:43:45 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:05:35 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by fleebut
[Yesterday at 05:05:02 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:01:48 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Yesterday at 04:36:39 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by Steve-O
[Yesterday at 04:20:35 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[Yesterday at 04:16:34 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 04:14:32 PM]


Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Yesterday at 04:00:42 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 03:55:27 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Yesterday at 03:55:11 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 03:50:11 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 03:50:10 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[Yesterday at 03:43:02 PM]


Re: Hey TD..Holiday Station Burnsville now has E85 by TD
[Yesterday at 03:39:22 PM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by mus302
[Yesterday at 03:35:47 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by rufus
[Yesterday at 03:35:32 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by fleebut
[Yesterday at 03:25:39 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 02:56:48 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 02:47:12 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 12:48:14 PM]


Re: Car & Driver alternate fuels article by Corey872
[Yesterday at 12:44:41 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Yesterday at 11:56:23 AM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 11:45:40 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 11:37:24 AM]


Re: US ethanol group proposes swapping subsidy for infrastructure by Dan M
[Yesterday at 10:17:08 AM]


Hey TD..Holiday Station Burnsville now has E85 by Dan M
[Yesterday at 09:18:07 AM]


Kansas E85 Pump Install Credits by Dan M
[Yesterday at 08:55:05 AM]


Re: New Vegas Station? by mpall85
[Yesterday at 08:50:54 AM]


Car & Driver alternate fuels article by beechcraftted
[Yesterday at 08:25:03 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Dan M
[Yesterday at 07:47:50 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by fleebut
[Yesterday at 07:31:20 AM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by Corey872
[Yesterday at 06:57:52 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Obormot
[Yesterday at 03:14:33 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by 1outlaw
[July 29, 2010, 11:05:39 PM]


Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:40:08 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[July 29, 2010, 07:40:12 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[July 29, 2010, 07:29:36 PM]


Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[July 29, 2010, 07:06:31 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[July 29, 2010, 06:04:00 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[July 29, 2010, 05:24:54 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by rufus
[July 29, 2010, 04:38:34 PM]


Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 04:27:07 PM]


Re: Station CLOSED in Tucson, AZ by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 01:27:26 PM]


Station CLOSED in Tucson, AZ by xstn0210
[July 29, 2010, 01:11:53 PM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by rufus
[July 29, 2010, 11:30:06 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by fleebut
[July 29, 2010, 11:12:50 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:51:01 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:48:40 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by BURNALCOHOL
[July 29, 2010, 10:22:42 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by BURNALCOHOL
[July 29, 2010, 10:09:39 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 09:51:23 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by SacramentoE-85
[July 29, 2010, 08:56:47 AM]


* Latest Images

No attachments were found.