collapse

* E85 Vehicles Sponsors


Author Topic: So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)  (Read 1007 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online 1outlaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 2425
So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)
« on: February 14, 2010, 10:30:53 PM »
I have had this hit and miss engine sitting in my shed for years- It runs beautifully except the gas always goes bad in the tank. Problem is that it has a vented tank and it is very hard to drain fuel out of it- -which is what should always be done with gas or E85. This old girl could provide vacumn for milking cows or as stationary power for things like pumping water. I also have the pump jack (to pump water) and an air compressor (but with a broken crank) to match. I need to find a 4"x 20' canvas drive belt to use the accessories and have to study the vacumn side to pipe it up. She was on our farm and mostly pumped water back in the 20's thru the 40's. The way this engine creates vacumn is via the piston inside the main piston. Main piston is a little smaller than a gallon paint can. While only rated 2 hp- all engines of that era put out far more since all maker underated them to avoid the "horsepower tax" of the time (gas guzzler tax ;D). --Actually she uses very little fuel even if run all day, the govt just needed to pay for WW1 in 1917 when she was made and an HP tax was it. There were a lot of normal hit and miss engines at the time- clear up thru a massive 15 hp that could run a sawmill. This one is unique because of it's ability to produce a vacumn directly without a separate vacumn pump needed by dairymen.

Here is what what a Taylor Vacumn Engine looks like;

http://www.oldengine.org/members/inzero/
« Last Edit: February 14, 2010, 10:46:07 PM by 1outlaw »

 

Online fleebut

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 509
Re: So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2010, 05:38:09 AM »
May this be a hybrid? Utilize the much more efficient as compared to batteries...inertia. Also, notice the "modern" cylinder deactivation technology. Now the weight problem?

Online 1outlaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 2425
Re: So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2010, 05:21:13 PM »
I am not actually worried at all about cylinder lubrication on my Taylor. They only turn over 900 rpm max and only fire when the flywheels start to slow. Normal firing is only 1 "lick" in about every 10-12 rounds, even less w/o load, or just a bit more if under high load. With the top glass cylinder oiler I can control the amount she receives very easily. I also likely will not have to mess with the carb's jet as there is a lot of screw adjustment available. This engine may have even been set up to run alcohol for all I know. I will need to see if any of the carb parts are brass (ok) or if they are bronze (not so good) -- anyone know how to tell the difference?
The other issue could be tank construction since it appears to have been lead soldered. Starting might indeed be a challenge- this is the current challenge when the gas gets old and loses it's vapor pressure thru the open tank vent. Like I said- I need to study how I can drain the tank when I am done playing so as not to either let the gas go sour or the E85 to gain moisture. I just pull it out once a year and light her off to make noise in the neighborhood-- though it would be fun to take it to some of the local summer "hit and miss" shows nearby (you can bet it would have an Renew E85 sign on it  ;) ). Mine is not all painted and pretty like the one in the link. Mine has a lot of nice patina, in original paint, and is sitting on the original heavy 4 steel wheel steerable cart. If I can't find a decent belt and a way to "pin the crank" in the old air compressor- I may have to get the vacumn side up and running plus find a milking machine and a "happy milk cow", find an old hand water pump to go with my pump jack, OR go find an old "White Mountain" hand crank ice cream maker, put a pulley on it, and make ice cream for show. Methinks the last is the best solution ;D

Darn fool thing weighs about 200 lbs with the cart. ::)
« Last Edit: February 15, 2010, 05:21:57 PM by 1outlaw »

Offline rusty70f100

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2006
  • Posts: 955
Re: So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)
« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2010, 04:09:52 PM »
I appreciate that you came up with some more suggestions, but I remain skeptical.  The Redline stuff I mentioned was supposed to mix.  It did not.  I think methanol is different than ethanol, which is different than retail pump E85, in terms of oil mixing.  The only way to see what works, in my opinion, is to actually try it.
"A man may die, nations may rise and fall but an idea lives on" - JFK

Offline Obormot

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 93
    • Ukrainian Ethanol fuel forum.
Re: So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2010, 03:08:14 PM »
Castrol M Castor Based Lubricant
Competition oil. Superior Castor based engine oil often used in historic vehicle racing where methanol fuel is used.



Motul Micro 2T
2-Stroke oil for model planes,boats,cars. Can be mixed with methanol, nitromethane or ether. Also for top feul dragsters for top end engine lubrication



2t Silkolene Pro Kr-2
Price Range:$14.39 — $15.17 Average Price:$14.78 —— A Castor/ester synthetic blend, 2-stroke Kart Racing engine oil. Blended formulation combines the natural high film strength of Castor while reducing the normal lacquer build up associated with it. Suitable for premixing with all gasoline, alcohol and methanol fuels. KR-2 cannot be mixed with any other types of oils. SAE Rating 30 wt.



or you can use natural castor oil.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2010, 03:22:12 PM by Obormot »
Ukrainian Ethanol fuel forum.
http://ey95.com/forum/index.php

Offline rusty70f100

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2006
  • Posts: 955
Re: So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2010, 01:58:01 PM »
I had major problems with 2-stroke oil in E85.  Regular conventional 2-stroke oil will eventually separate and leave goo on the bottom of the gas tank, plugging things up.  Redline 2-stroke Allsport oil, while better than conventional 2-stroke oil, will partially separate.  It goes in red, but there's a small amount of very thick tan colored goo that forms on the bottom of the tank, also eventually plugging things up.  Redline used to make a 2-stroke alcohol premix.  But they don't make that any more.  >:(

The only thing I've found that works is Klotz Benol.  But I've heard that has problems under freezing.

If anyone knows of something that works and won't separate, please speak up.  I am interested in trying biodiesel, but where can I obtain B100?
"A man may die, nations may rise and fall but an idea lives on" - JFK

Online cessna

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2006
  • Posts: 741
Re: So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2010, 11:21:16 AM »
 
Quote
Though you would be looking to mix that with ethanol - so that goes back to the issues of finding a good two stroke oil which won't separate.

BIODIESEL :) ;)

Offline Corey872

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 840
Re: So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2010, 11:16:11 AM »
Interesting read.  I've always been fascinated by old technology, whether it's hit-n-miss engines, vacuum tubes and electronics, steam, etc.

I suppose you could run the engine on E85 - with all the standard caveats - making sure all the soft parts can handle the alcohol.

If you are actually going to use this as a workhorse, there might be a couple more things to consider...  I doubt the compression was very high to begin with.  Worn rings, cylinder, etc probably haven't made it higher over the years.  Starting might be a little harder - especially in cold weather.

The issue of power piston lubrication was brought up - and the modern solution seems to be using two stroke oil, which should work fine.  Though you would be looking to mix that with ethanol - so that goes back to the issues of finding a good two stroke oil which won't separate.

 
∙ E85 Acura RSX-S Turbo ∙ 2.0L ∙ 12.5:1 CR ∙ Precision 5857 Turbo @ 15psi ∙
 The E85-only build begins

E85 "The biggest performance fuel bargain on the planet" - Gale Banks

Online Dan M

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 5028
  • E85 Prices
    • E85 Vehicles
Re: So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2010, 08:15:25 AM »

Here is what what a Taylor Vacumn Engine looks like;

http://www.oldengine.org/members/inzero/


Outlaw really enjoyed reading that guys "journey" getting the old engine up and running .. very cool following him as he is learning more about the engine and finding solutions and parts

Online James48843

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 927
Re: So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2010, 07:33:05 AM »
Why did they call these engines donkey engines? Thats the slang?

Donkey was the work animal in much of the 19th century and early 20th century. They were the pack animals, the work animals in mines, in building roadways, in agriculture, etc.  Those who could not afford horses to plow with used donkeys.   Donkeys were used in logging, to drag timber out of the woods.  Etc. Etc.   

On sailing ships in the 19th century, the first "Donkey Engines" were small engines that were used to load and unload cargo, replacing the donkey of the day in lifting with ropes. These were external combustion engines (steam engines), and used a rope over a yardarm to lift out the cargo.

The invention of the small external combustion engine, and then internal combustion engines, greatly replaced these animals around the farm, ships,  and around small business. You didn't have to feed an engine anything except gasoline, and you didn't have to clean up after them.  You could drag logs out of the woods on a rope, instead of with a Donkey.

Here's one that replaced donkeys in Gold Mining:
http://www.skagitriverjournal.com/S-W/Business/Post1900/SS/SSAlaskaDonkey1913.jpg

"Steam Donkeys" were engines built in the woods to drag logs out of the forest:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_donkey
« Last Edit: February 15, 2010, 07:45:24 AM by James48843 »
Check http://www.E85prices.com for Ethanol fueling station locations nationwide

Online fleebut

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 509
Re: So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2010, 05:54:32 AM »
Cast iron is wonderful for stationary engines. Those engines had long efficient strokes and operated low rpm. High torque at a cost of weight. Yes, efficient, but to expensive a design for today. Ship engines looked some  what like this. The large diameter piston has better energy for the friction robbing surfaces. Slow rpm engines more efficient for pumping air. Why did they call these engines donkey engines? Thats the slang?

Online James48843

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 927
Re: So should I?? (Run a Taylor Vacumn Engine on E85)
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2010, 05:05:36 AM »
Nice-  I love old engines.
Check http://www.E85prices.com for Ethanol fueling station locations nationwide

 


* Untitled

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

* Menu


* E85 Vehicles Ads


* National E85 Prices


* Online Now


* GM Wants 10,000 E85 Pumps

"GM strongly supports their deployment" "We believe these pumps (blender pumps) will be critical "

* Calendar

July 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 [31]

No calendar events were found.

* E85 Pump Install Credits -Federal

Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Tax Credit A tax credit is available for the cost of installing alternative fueling equipment placed into service after December 31, 2005. < /br>Qualified alternative fuels are natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, hydrogen, electricity, E85, or diesel fuel blends containing a minimum of 20% biodiesel. < /br>The credit amount is up to 30% of the cost, not to exceed $30,000, for equipment placed into service before January 1, 2009. The credit amount is up to 50% not to exceed $50,000, for equipment placed into service on or after January 1, 2009.

Fueling station owners who install qualified equipment at multiple sites are allowed to use the credit towards each location. Consumers who purchase residential fueling equipment may receive a tax credit of up to $1,000, which increases to $2,000 for equipment placed into service after December 31, 2008. The maximum credit amount for hydrogen fueling equipment placed into service after December 31, 2008, and before January 1, 2015, is $200,000. The credit expires December 31, 2010, for all other eligible fuel types. Unused credits that qualify as general business tax credits, as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), may be carried backward one year and carried forward 20 years. For more information, see IRS Form 8911 and/or Form 3800, which are available via the IRS Web site. (Reference Public Law 111-5, Section 1123, and 26 U.S. Code 30C and 38B) Point of Contact U.S. Internal Revenue Service Phone: (800) 829-1040 http://www.irs.gov/


* Coskata


* Government Flex Fuel Vehicle Auctions

Government Agencies Used Flex Fuel Vehicles

Used FFVs


* Recent Posts

Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by fleebut
[Today at 01:01:38 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Today at 12:45:48 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Today at 12:21:51 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Today at 12:08:59 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Today at 11:15:57 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by SacramentoE-85
[Today at 10:42:12 AM]


Re: The Kingdom Movie by fleebut
[Today at 08:23:23 AM]


Re: No E85 at Woodman's in Rockford IL. by whowey
[Today at 07:35:57 AM]


Re: The Kingdom Movie by fleebut
[Today at 07:27:26 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Today at 07:16:06 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Today at 06:34:33 AM]


The Kingdom Movie by SacramentoE-85
[Yesterday at 11:26:30 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by SacramentoE-85
[Yesterday at 10:52:27 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 10:10:19 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[Yesterday at 07:46:07 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[Yesterday at 05:54:37 PM]


Re: Car & Driver alternate fuels article by TD
[Yesterday at 05:47:46 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:43:45 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:05:35 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by fleebut
[Yesterday at 05:05:02 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:01:48 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Yesterday at 04:36:39 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by Steve-O
[Yesterday at 04:20:35 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[Yesterday at 04:16:34 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 04:14:32 PM]


Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Yesterday at 04:00:42 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 03:55:27 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Yesterday at 03:55:11 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 03:50:11 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 03:50:10 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[Yesterday at 03:43:02 PM]


Re: Hey TD..Holiday Station Burnsville now has E85 by TD
[Yesterday at 03:39:22 PM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by mus302
[Yesterday at 03:35:47 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by rufus
[Yesterday at 03:35:32 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by fleebut
[Yesterday at 03:25:39 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 02:56:48 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 02:47:12 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 12:48:14 PM]


Re: Car & Driver alternate fuels article by Corey872
[Yesterday at 12:44:41 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Yesterday at 11:56:23 AM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 11:45:40 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 11:37:24 AM]


Re: US ethanol group proposes swapping subsidy for infrastructure by Dan M
[Yesterday at 10:17:08 AM]


Hey TD..Holiday Station Burnsville now has E85 by Dan M
[Yesterday at 09:18:07 AM]


Kansas E85 Pump Install Credits by Dan M
[Yesterday at 08:55:05 AM]


Re: New Vegas Station? by mpall85
[Yesterday at 08:50:54 AM]


Car & Driver alternate fuels article by beechcraftted
[Yesterday at 08:25:03 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Dan M
[Yesterday at 07:47:50 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by fleebut
[Yesterday at 07:31:20 AM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by Corey872
[Yesterday at 06:57:52 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Obormot
[Yesterday at 03:14:33 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by 1outlaw
[July 29, 2010, 11:05:39 PM]


Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:40:08 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[July 29, 2010, 07:40:12 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[July 29, 2010, 07:29:36 PM]


Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[July 29, 2010, 07:06:31 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[July 29, 2010, 06:04:00 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[July 29, 2010, 05:24:54 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by rufus
[July 29, 2010, 04:38:34 PM]


Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 04:27:07 PM]


Re: Station CLOSED in Tucson, AZ by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 01:27:26 PM]


Station CLOSED in Tucson, AZ by xstn0210
[July 29, 2010, 01:11:53 PM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by rufus
[July 29, 2010, 11:30:06 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by fleebut
[July 29, 2010, 11:12:50 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:51:01 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:48:40 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by BURNALCOHOL
[July 29, 2010, 10:22:42 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by BURNALCOHOL
[July 29, 2010, 10:09:39 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 09:51:23 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by SacramentoE-85
[July 29, 2010, 08:56:47 AM]


* Latest Images

No attachments were found.