collapse

* E85 Vehicles Sponsors


Author Topic: More anti ethanol perverts  (Read 920 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Dan M

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 5028
  • E85 Prices
    • E85 Vehicles
« Last Edit: March 19, 2009, 06:06:06 PM by colchiro »

 

Offline Thumpin455

  • 70 GeTOh 455
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 530
Re: More anti ethanol perverts
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2009, 11:07:57 AM »
That's exactly what I was thinking.  As soon as we leave the middle east, the price of oil is going to skyrocket, and supply will dry up.  I just wish more people understood that.  Unfortunately, trying to talk sense into the anti-ethanol people is like trying to talk to the wind.

I think the best thing a person can do is try to secure his own energy future.  Either by making his own fuel, or helping others set up a local solution.  When we pull out of the middle east, I'm sure you'll have a market.

If anyone wants to post my comments over there, feel free.  ;)

Edit:  Oops, too late.   :D

Rusty we are now on the same page...  Take care of yourself first, everyone else will come to those who can to find out how when they have no other choice. Soon we will be bending over for Russia and even more for China because Russia will have the oil, and for some reason we want China to give us everything. I guess so our kids can lick lead chips. Our only recourse is to make our own energy right here, and do it both on the large scale, and the small scale.

As for solders in the mid east, well I carried far too many of them on their last trip home while on my last deployment. Some people will use that as a reason, or to make their argument a bit tougher to rebut. Not saying you are doing that here, but some people do. It makes the thought of what we are doing over there different when it is a personal experience with nameless soldiers in flag draped transfer cases. Yeah I want us out of there. I want us out of everywhere that we are not being attacked from. How many people on both sides have we killed over oil, when there is a better fuel available?

In my opinion, if you are against ethanol fuel, made right here in the USA, and you are against alternative energy and reducing our dependence on imported oil, well you are a seriously misguided citizen that needs an education. I guess they still have a right to hate the USA if they want, I just dont want to be anyone's whipping boy for energy. I already gave enough for oil, I wont give any more.
Not knocking E85, but I don't need any gasoline. Thanks. Home grown ethanol works fine for me.

Offline rusty70f100

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2006
  • Posts: 955
Re: More anti ethanol perverts
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2009, 10:23:35 AM »
That's exactly what I was thinking.  As soon as we leave the middle east, the price of oil is going to skyrocket, and supply will dry up.  I just wish more people understood that.  Unfortunately, trying to talk sense into the anti-ethanol people is like trying to talk to the wind.

I think the best thing a person can do is try to secure his own energy future.  Either by making his own fuel, or helping others set up a local solution.  When we pull out of the middle east, I'm sure you'll have a market.

If anyone wants to post my comments over there, feel free.  ;)

Edit:  Oops, too late.   :D
« Last Edit: March 20, 2009, 10:30:09 AM by rusty70f100 »
"A man may die, nations may rise and fall but an idea lives on" - JFK

Offline SacramentoE-85

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1141
    • SacramentoE85
Re: More anti ethanol perverts
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2009, 12:36:26 AM »
Dan, thanks for the link; I left my 2 dollars (what with inflation coming and all)...

Rusty, your point is very valid.  Also, it may be prophetic.  One thing that our massively growing debt will lead to is a pull back in military.  When that happens the Middle East will explode and gasoline prices will go through the penthouse roof.  We won't be prepared with enough ethanol, biodiesel, hydrogen, CNG, etc. and many will suffer.  It will be a very hard lesson learned.

It's very simple to see.  Within 2 or 3 years there just won't be a budget for the military operations, and politically the troops also will be called back.  We can't scale up alt fuels quickly enough in 2 or 3 years, nor 5 years.  I believe that this Middle East explosion would happen within 5 years from now.  I hope I am wrong.  This would make the Great Depression a mini recession.  Right now we are really not that bad off, compared to how things likely could become.  Just saying.   :(

The greed of those involved with Big Oil has delayed our energy security for far too long.  Only a miracle will keep the above from happening.  At least we could start by pouring everything into alt fuels right now, lessening the effect somewhat.  It doesn't look good when you have the CA Air Resources Board trying to prove corn ethanol worse than gasoline in terms of CO2, effectively cutting off future support for first generation ethanol here and the other 11 states interested in following CA's lead.
Sacramento E85 Website Locations of E85 stations, News, Guides, CA E85 Regulations, other CA related ethanol information.

Online Dan M

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 5028
  • E85 Prices
    • E85 Vehicles
Re: More anti ethanol perverts
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2009, 06:25:09 PM »
Post it over there Rusty..flame away  :D
Morons.

How's this for an idea:

Remove the oil subsidies (seriously, all of 'em), and pull us entirely out of the middle east.  ASAP.  Meaning, as soon as we can get our sh*t lined up and moved out.  That would save money.  Then cut all ethanol subsidies.  Take the money and give us some serious tax cuts.  Entirely level the playing field.  Then, we'll see what comes out ahead.  I'm betting we wouldn't be able to produce ethanol fast enough.  :D

In my mind, even 1 American soldier's life is not worth all the oil in the middle east.  If you burn gasoline, you're not burning what you think.  You're burning the blood of our soldiers.

I have more, but it would get rather political.  ;)

Offline rusty70f100

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2006
  • Posts: 955
Re: More anti ethanol perverts
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2009, 06:05:13 PM »
Morons.

How's this for an idea:

Remove the oil subsidies (seriously, all of 'em), and pull us entirely out of the middle east.  ASAP.  Meaning, as soon as we can get our sh*t lined up and moved out.  That would save money.  Then cut all ethanol subsidies.  Take the money and give us some serious tax cuts.  Entirely level the playing field.  Then, we'll see what comes out ahead.  I'm betting we wouldn't be able to produce ethanol fast enough.  :D

In my mind, even 1 American soldier's life is not worth all the oil in the middle east.  If you burn gasoline, you're not burning what you think.  You're burning the blood of our soldiers.

I have more, but it would get rather political.  ;)
« Last Edit: March 19, 2009, 06:06:00 PM by rusty70f100 »
"A man may die, nations may rise and fall but an idea lives on" - JFK

 


* Untitled

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

* Menu


* E85 Vehicles Ads


* National E85 Prices


* Online Now


* GM Wants 10,000 E85 Pumps

"GM strongly supports their deployment" "We believe these pumps (blender pumps) will be critical "

* Calendar

July 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 [31]

No calendar events were found.

* E85 Pump Install Credits -Federal

Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Tax Credit A tax credit is available for the cost of installing alternative fueling equipment placed into service after December 31, 2005. < /br>Qualified alternative fuels are natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, hydrogen, electricity, E85, or diesel fuel blends containing a minimum of 20% biodiesel. < /br>The credit amount is up to 30% of the cost, not to exceed $30,000, for equipment placed into service before January 1, 2009. The credit amount is up to 50% not to exceed $50,000, for equipment placed into service on or after January 1, 2009.

Fueling station owners who install qualified equipment at multiple sites are allowed to use the credit towards each location. Consumers who purchase residential fueling equipment may receive a tax credit of up to $1,000, which increases to $2,000 for equipment placed into service after December 31, 2008. The maximum credit amount for hydrogen fueling equipment placed into service after December 31, 2008, and before January 1, 2015, is $200,000. The credit expires December 31, 2010, for all other eligible fuel types. Unused credits that qualify as general business tax credits, as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), may be carried backward one year and carried forward 20 years. For more information, see IRS Form 8911 and/or Form 3800, which are available via the IRS Web site. (Reference Public Law 111-5, Section 1123, and 26 U.S. Code 30C and 38B) Point of Contact U.S. Internal Revenue Service Phone: (800) 829-1040 http://www.irs.gov/


* Coskata


* Government Flex Fuel Vehicle Auctions

Government Agencies Used Flex Fuel Vehicles

Used FFVs


* Recent Posts

Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by rufus
[Today at 01:44:40 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by fleebut
[Today at 01:01:38 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Today at 12:45:48 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Today at 12:21:51 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Today at 12:08:59 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Today at 11:15:57 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by SacramentoE-85
[Today at 10:42:12 AM]


Re: The Kingdom Movie by fleebut
[Today at 08:23:23 AM]


Re: No E85 at Woodman's in Rockford IL. by whowey
[Today at 07:35:57 AM]


Re: The Kingdom Movie by fleebut
[Today at 07:27:26 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Today at 07:16:06 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Today at 06:34:33 AM]


The Kingdom Movie by SacramentoE-85
[Yesterday at 11:26:30 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by SacramentoE-85
[Yesterday at 10:52:27 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 10:10:19 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[Yesterday at 07:46:07 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[Yesterday at 05:54:37 PM]


Re: Car & Driver alternate fuels article by TD
[Yesterday at 05:47:46 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:43:45 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:05:35 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by fleebut
[Yesterday at 05:05:02 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:01:48 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Yesterday at 04:36:39 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by Steve-O
[Yesterday at 04:20:35 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[Yesterday at 04:16:34 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 04:14:32 PM]


Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Yesterday at 04:00:42 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 03:55:27 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Yesterday at 03:55:11 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 03:50:11 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 03:50:10 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[Yesterday at 03:43:02 PM]


Re: Hey TD..Holiday Station Burnsville now has E85 by TD
[Yesterday at 03:39:22 PM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by mus302
[Yesterday at 03:35:47 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by rufus
[Yesterday at 03:35:32 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by fleebut
[Yesterday at 03:25:39 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 02:56:48 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 02:47:12 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 12:48:14 PM]


Re: Car & Driver alternate fuels article by Corey872
[Yesterday at 12:44:41 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Yesterday at 11:56:23 AM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 11:45:40 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 11:37:24 AM]


Re: US ethanol group proposes swapping subsidy for infrastructure by Dan M
[Yesterday at 10:17:08 AM]


Hey TD..Holiday Station Burnsville now has E85 by Dan M
[Yesterday at 09:18:07 AM]


Kansas E85 Pump Install Credits by Dan M
[Yesterday at 08:55:05 AM]


Re: New Vegas Station? by mpall85
[Yesterday at 08:50:54 AM]


Car & Driver alternate fuels article by beechcraftted
[Yesterday at 08:25:03 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Dan M
[Yesterday at 07:47:50 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by fleebut
[Yesterday at 07:31:20 AM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by Corey872
[Yesterday at 06:57:52 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Obormot
[Yesterday at 03:14:33 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by 1outlaw
[July 29, 2010, 11:05:39 PM]


Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:40:08 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[July 29, 2010, 07:40:12 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[July 29, 2010, 07:29:36 PM]


Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[July 29, 2010, 07:06:31 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[July 29, 2010, 06:04:00 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[July 29, 2010, 05:24:54 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by rufus
[July 29, 2010, 04:38:34 PM]


Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 04:27:07 PM]


Re: Station CLOSED in Tucson, AZ by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 01:27:26 PM]


Station CLOSED in Tucson, AZ by xstn0210
[July 29, 2010, 01:11:53 PM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by rufus
[July 29, 2010, 11:30:06 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by fleebut
[July 29, 2010, 11:12:50 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:51:01 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:48:40 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by BURNALCOHOL
[July 29, 2010, 10:22:42 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by BURNALCOHOL
[July 29, 2010, 10:09:39 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 09:51:23 AM]


* Latest Images

No attachments were found.