collapse

* E85 Vehicles Sponsors


Author Topic: Sheetz Stores in Pittsburgh region offer E85  (Read 1729 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Billyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 403
Sheetz Stores in Pittsburgh region offer E85
« on: July 02, 2008, 08:54:55 PM »
There is three Sheetz stores in the Pittsburgh region that offer E85.  :) There are many other Sheetz stores in this region.   There are no ethanol plants in southwestern Pa other than the Costka plant under construction in Madison, Pa.  This Costka plant will produce ethanol for GM and will serve as a demonstration plant that Costka wants to license the technology to others.  The major ethanol effort in Pa.  is occuring on the other side of the state where an Ethanol corriodor is being constructed into the Philadephia region--home of Pennsylvania's governor. 
2005 Ford Escape Hybrid

 

Offline mpersell

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 486
Re: Sheetz Stores in Pittsburgh region offer E85
« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2008, 06:22:10 PM »
Loan guarantee from the gov't, and a line of credit from private banks, and they did pay it off early.  They did however sell the tank and tank engine division for a paltry $7 million.  There was one week where they had only a million in the bank.  It was scary times for them.

Dan, you may be correct but I don't think the politicians will let GM totally hit the floor.  I am old enough to remember Chrysler being bailed out in 1979 with a 1.2 billion dollar loan and by 1983 they were making money and actually paid off the loan early.  
« Last Edit: July 03, 2008, 06:23:07 PM by mpersell »
2007 Dodge Ram 1500 Quad Cab  FFV,  Schaeffer Synthetic Plus Oil Throughout

Online Dan M

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 5028
  • E85 Prices
    • E85 Vehicles
Re: Sheetz Stores in Pittsburgh region offer E85
« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2008, 05:28:03 PM »
Billy I have no doubts Congress would step in to save GM's tail ..

I just believe that GM is already looking well past just producing vehicles..

In less than 3 years we are mandated through HR 6 to be producing 1 Billion Gallons of Cellulose Ethanol..it will happen and it will happen because congress made certian to include the proper incentives $$$ for development and investment..also the pressure because of the Food/Fuel debate will only move us faster in that direction..  GM I believe has it's sights squarley on thohse billions in upcoming revenues .

producing the electric vehicle remains expensive and unprofitable for many decades and even then unless they own part of the electric grid are relying on one source of revenues ..making cars

With E85 Vehicles they diverisfy their income sources and can be a major player in the ethanol market ..what could be better than profiting not only from your vehicle sales but the fuel that powers them


Dan, you may be correct but I don't think the politicians will let GM totally hit the floor.  I am old enough to remember Chrysler being bailed out in 1979 with a 1.2 billion dollar loan and by 1983 they were making money and actually paid off the loan early.   All of the domestic automakers are adapting to a changing market.   Will the changes be too late, too little?  Time wil tell.

This Costka cellulose development needs to be monitored closely.   If Costka's plant produces as advertised, GM (as well as other domestic vehicles) and consumers could significantly benefit from lower fuel costs and vehicles designed to run on E85.   The upcoming GM Volt (as other new domestic vehicles) is being designed to will run on E85 if the owner desires.  I don't believe the Asian automakers have put much effort into developing FFV or E85 capable vehicles.  GM could regain part of the new car sales market with this Costka development.  Then again, how long does it take to constructed large cellulose ethanol producton plants?  Is there "money-credit' available for such a development. 

Somthing that is rarely discussed is the "carbon-neutral" or even "negative" factor with ethanol production.   I have read in the past few months that the newest plants will be "carbon-negative".  I'm unable to easily put this into easy to understand words and will have to refer this to someone else who has a better grasp of this concept.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2008, 05:29:18 PM by Dan M »

Offline DragonWhip

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 795
Re: Sheetz Stores in Pittsburgh region offer E85
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2008, 04:50:09 PM »
Just a little off topic, the reason Chrysler was saved is that they produced the engines for our military Tanks. Later.
1993 Jeep Cherokee 5-spd 4.0l
Fuel Flex Platinum setting 5
Pulstar be-1 Plugs  Love My Linux  My e85 Gallery My e85 Gallery

Online Billyk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 403
Re: Sheetz Stores in Pittsburgh region offer E85
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2008, 09:55:01 PM »
Dan, you may be correct but I don't think the politicians will let GM totally hit the floor.  I am old enough to remember Chrysler being bailed out in 1979 with a 1.2 billion dollar loan and by 1983 they were making money and actually paid off the loan early.   All of the domestic automakers are adapting to a changing market.   Will the changes be too late, too little?  Time wil tell.

This Costka cellulose development needs to be monitored closely.   If Costka's plant produces as advertised, GM (as well as other domestic vehicles) and consumers could significantly benefit from lower fuel costs and vehicles designed to run on E85.   The upcoming GM Volt (as other new domestic vehicles) is being designed to will run on E85 if the owner desires.  I don't believe the Asian automakers have put much effort into developing FFV or E85 capable vehicles.  GM could regain part of the new car sales market with this Costka development.  Then again, how long does it take to constructed large cellulose ethanol producton plants?  Is there "money-credit' available for such a development. 

Somthing that is rarely discussed is the "carbon-neutral" or even "negative" factor with ethanol production.   I have read in the past few months that the newest plants will be "carbon-negative".  I'm unable to easily put this into easy to understand words and will have to refer this to someone else who has a better grasp of this concept.
2005 Ford Escape Hybrid

Online Dan M

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 5028
  • E85 Prices
    • E85 Vehicles
Re: Sheetz Stores in Pittsburgh region offer E85
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2008, 09:00:44 PM »
There is three Sheetz stores in the Pittsburgh region that offer E85.  :) There are many other Sheetz stores in this region.   There are no ethanol plants in southwestern Pa other than the Costka plant under construction in Madison, Pa.  This Costka plant will produce ethanol for GM and will serve as a demonstration plant that Costka wants to license the technology to others.  The major ethanol effort in Pa.  is occuring on the other side of the state where an Ethanol corriodor is being constructed into the Philadephia region--home of Pennsylvania's governor. 

There is talk of GM possibly needing bankruptcy ..they have enough cash to get through 2008 . I really believe part of the long term solution for GM could be in Costka.. selling not only the vehilces but owning a stake in the cellulose ethanol to power them .. going to take a few years to get the bal rolling

Think cell Phones.. the real money isnt in the Phones (cars) it's in the service subscriptions (fuel)..

 


* Untitled

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

* Menu


* E85 Vehicles Ads


* National E85 Prices


* Online Now


* GM Wants 10,000 E85 Pumps

"GM strongly supports their deployment" "We believe these pumps (blender pumps) will be critical "

* Calendar

July 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 [31]

No calendar events were found.

* E85 Pump Install Credits -Federal

Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Tax Credit A tax credit is available for the cost of installing alternative fueling equipment placed into service after December 31, 2005. < /br>Qualified alternative fuels are natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, hydrogen, electricity, E85, or diesel fuel blends containing a minimum of 20% biodiesel. < /br>The credit amount is up to 30% of the cost, not to exceed $30,000, for equipment placed into service before January 1, 2009. The credit amount is up to 50% not to exceed $50,000, for equipment placed into service on or after January 1, 2009.

Fueling station owners who install qualified equipment at multiple sites are allowed to use the credit towards each location. Consumers who purchase residential fueling equipment may receive a tax credit of up to $1,000, which increases to $2,000 for equipment placed into service after December 31, 2008. The maximum credit amount for hydrogen fueling equipment placed into service after December 31, 2008, and before January 1, 2015, is $200,000. The credit expires December 31, 2010, for all other eligible fuel types. Unused credits that qualify as general business tax credits, as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), may be carried backward one year and carried forward 20 years. For more information, see IRS Form 8911 and/or Form 3800, which are available via the IRS Web site. (Reference Public Law 111-5, Section 1123, and 26 U.S. Code 30C and 38B) Point of Contact U.S. Internal Revenue Service Phone: (800) 829-1040 http://www.irs.gov/


* Coskata


* Government Flex Fuel Vehicle Auctions

Government Agencies Used Flex Fuel Vehicles

Used FFVs


* Recent Posts

Re: No E85 at Woodman's in Rockford IL. by furball64801
[Today at 02:00:58 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by rufus
[Today at 01:44:40 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by fleebut
[Today at 01:01:38 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Today at 12:45:48 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Today at 12:21:51 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Today at 12:08:59 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Today at 11:15:57 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by SacramentoE-85
[Today at 10:42:12 AM]


Re: The Kingdom Movie by fleebut
[Today at 08:23:23 AM]


Re: No E85 at Woodman's in Rockford IL. by whowey
[Today at 07:35:57 AM]


Re: The Kingdom Movie by fleebut
[Today at 07:27:26 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Today at 07:16:06 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Today at 06:34:33 AM]


The Kingdom Movie by SacramentoE-85
[Yesterday at 11:26:30 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by SacramentoE-85
[Yesterday at 10:52:27 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 10:10:19 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[Yesterday at 07:46:07 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[Yesterday at 05:54:37 PM]


Re: Car & Driver alternate fuels article by TD
[Yesterday at 05:47:46 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:43:45 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:05:35 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by fleebut
[Yesterday at 05:05:02 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 05:01:48 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Yesterday at 04:36:39 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by Steve-O
[Yesterday at 04:20:35 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[Yesterday at 04:16:34 PM]


Re: Now this is just plain stupid.... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 04:14:32 PM]


Now this is just plain stupid.... by TD
[Yesterday at 04:00:42 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 03:55:27 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[Yesterday at 03:55:11 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 03:50:11 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 03:50:10 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[Yesterday at 03:43:02 PM]


Re: Hey TD..Holiday Station Burnsville now has E85 by TD
[Yesterday at 03:39:22 PM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by mus302
[Yesterday at 03:35:47 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by rufus
[Yesterday at 03:35:32 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by fleebut
[Yesterday at 03:25:39 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 02:56:48 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 02:47:12 PM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by 1outlaw
[Yesterday at 12:48:14 PM]


Re: Car & Driver alternate fuels article by Corey872
[Yesterday at 12:44:41 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[Yesterday at 11:56:23 AM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[Yesterday at 11:45:40 AM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by EMAS
[Yesterday at 11:37:24 AM]


Re: US ethanol group proposes swapping subsidy for infrastructure by Dan M
[Yesterday at 10:17:08 AM]


Hey TD..Holiday Station Burnsville now has E85 by Dan M
[Yesterday at 09:18:07 AM]


Kansas E85 Pump Install Credits by Dan M
[Yesterday at 08:55:05 AM]


Re: New Vegas Station? by mpall85
[Yesterday at 08:50:54 AM]


Car & Driver alternate fuels article by beechcraftted
[Yesterday at 08:25:03 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Dan M
[Yesterday at 07:47:50 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by fleebut
[Yesterday at 07:31:20 AM]


Re: Ok this is just weird... by Corey872
[Yesterday at 06:57:52 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Obormot
[Yesterday at 03:14:33 AM]


Re: Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by 1outlaw
[July 29, 2010, 11:05:39 PM]


Diesel Ignition Improvers for smoother idle and cold starts by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:40:08 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[July 29, 2010, 07:40:12 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by fleebut
[July 29, 2010, 07:29:36 PM]


Ok this is just weird... by rusty70f100
[July 29, 2010, 07:06:31 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by mus302
[July 29, 2010, 06:04:00 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by TD
[July 29, 2010, 05:24:54 PM]


Re: Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by rufus
[July 29, 2010, 04:38:34 PM]


Trouble for ethanol (E15): House panel questions EPA by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 04:27:07 PM]


Re: Station CLOSED in Tucson, AZ by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 01:27:26 PM]


Station CLOSED in Tucson, AZ by xstn0210
[July 29, 2010, 01:11:53 PM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by rufus
[July 29, 2010, 11:30:06 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by fleebut
[July 29, 2010, 11:12:50 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:51:01 AM]


Re: Contact Senator Harry Reid to add FFV's and Blender Pumps to Energy Bill by Dan M
[July 29, 2010, 10:48:40 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by BURNALCOHOL
[July 29, 2010, 10:22:42 AM]


Re: Updates, additions and corrections for Nebraska stations! by BURNALCOHOL
[July 29, 2010, 10:09:39 AM]


* Latest Images

No attachments were found.